3 ms·
If they do, they should also read commentary: https://earthscience.stackexchange.com/questions/25227/what-is-technically-wrong-with-wijngaarden-happers-paper-cl
by throwaway43156 1y ago
If they do, they should also read commentary: https://earthscience.stackexchange.com/questions/25227/what-is-technically-wrong-with-wijngaarden-happers-paper-claiming-to-show-tha https://earthscience.stackexchange.com/questions/25227/what-...
- adornKey 1y agoIf you look more, you'll most likely find more discussions. The things on StackExchange are a bit lame. There was a blog somewhere that posted about climate data for about a decade and had a discussion going on for maybe 2 months... I don't know if can find that again. Soon after the discussion of that paper the blog was pretty dead...
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]