3 ms·
The author of the article freely admits that `std::function<>` is more flexible. He still prefers this solution, as it is easier for him to reason about. This i
by pwagland 1y ago
The author of the article freely admits that `std::function<>` is more flexible. He still prefers this solution, as it is easier for him to reason about. This is covered in the "Fringe Benefits" part of the document.