3 ms·
Billionaires are the definition of unfairness. And therefore they are natural. Only From the perspective of civilization, of course, which is only a small frac
by ninetyninenine 1y ago
Billionaires are the definition of unfairness. And therefore they are natural.
Only From the perspective of civilization, of course, which is only a small fraction of human existence.
From the perspective humanity overall, not only are billionaires unnatural, but civilization in itself is unnatural. Hence all the declining birth rates we see today.
- oporquinho94 1y agoSounds like something you just made up. Kind of moot to argue what is natural and what isn’t. Unfairness or billionaires might be natural or not - that doesn’t mean we have to accept their existence. You know what else is natural? To die at 30 from dysentery or a broken leg. Natural is a nonsense category
- ninetyninenine 1y agoYou’re sort of confused. The person I’m responding to claimed it wasn’t natural. He came up with the category. So take your illogical argument up with him.
- croes 1y agohttps://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/unfairness https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/unfairness No mention of billionaires. Show me one billionaires in nature beside mankind. Billionaires now and then are artificially created by the systems mankind creates. They are an anomaly
- ninetyninenine 1y agoThis is just garbage. Not going to respond further to this.
- croes 1y agoYou could just say you have no arguments
- ninetyninenine 1y agoI do but your citation of the dictionary is fucking obviously not a legit argument so I won’t bother with you.
- croes 1y agoYou came up with the definition part, and dictionaries show definitions. Billionaires are an extreme example of unfairness not the definition. Otherwise most unfair things would be unfair at all compared to the unfairness of billionaires.