4 ms·
My analogy of being in loop means being in a live state. So we as humans are in the loop continuously, we do have a way to exit the loop, but in that comparison
by mewpmewp2 1y ago
My analogy of being in loop means being in a live state. So we as humans are in the loop continuously, we do have a way to exit the loop, but in that comparison it means taking our own life. We are in loops of getting input and producing output. You can also give LLM a tool to shut itself down, or you can give it tools to build on its knowledge base, so it would always be outputting new tokens that are based on new input and are producing different output.
E.g. it could have access to camera and microphone feed, which is automatically given to it in interval as part of the loop, it could call tools or functions to store specific bits and pieces of information, to store in its RAG or whatever based knowledge base. It is not going to be in the loop of producing the same token over and over, it would be new tokens because the context and environment is constantly evolving.
- ofjcihen 1y agoWe put the LLM in a loop with no instructions with whatever tools you want. Now what?
- mewpmewp2 1y agoWe will observe what it would do. We could write a script to try it out.
- Jensson 1y agoIt just gets into an endless loop. Human brains are ridiculously good at avoiding those somehow, you almost never see a biological brain stop functioning without being physically damaged. The error handling is so very robust.
- mewpmewp2 1y agoHave you tried it already? What is the endless loop it gets into?
- ben_w 1y ago> It just gets into an endless loop. Human brains are ridiculously good at avoiding those somehow, you almost never see a biological brain stop functioning without being physically damaged. The error handling is so very robust. We get constantly changing input. And yet, look at this thread, where the same points are being echoed without anyone changing their mind.