> base their answers to any questions on economic risk on their own best interests and a pretty short view of history. We used to just call that lying. > When

> base their answers to any questions on economic risk on their own best interests and a pretty short view of history. We used to just call that lying. > When AI finally does cause massive disruption to white collar work It has to exist first. Currently you have a chat bot that requires terabytes of copyrighted data to function and has sublinear increases in performances for exponential increases in costs. These guys genuinely seem to be arguing over a dead end. > what happens then? What happened when gasoline engines removed the need to have large pools of farm labor? It turns out people are far more clever than a "chat bot" and entire new economies became invented. > that we see some form of swift and punitive backlash, politically or otherwise. Or people just move onto the next thing. It's hilarious how small imaginations become when "AI" is being discussed.