3 ms·
I’m very skeptical of claims that all things will always do this and never do that, etc. IMO Jensen and others don’t know where AI is going any more than the r
by brookst 1y ago
I’m very skeptical of claims that all things will always do this and never do that, etc.
IMO Jensen and others don’t know where AI is going any more than the rest of us. Your imaginary dystopia is certainly possible, but I would warn against having complete conviction it is the only possible outcome.
- kbos87 1y agoFair point and I absolutely acknowledge that the future AI will usher in is still very much an unknown. I do think it's worth recognizing that there is one part of the story that is very predictable because it's happened over and over again - the part where some sort of innovation creates new efficiencies and advantages. I think it's fair to debate the extent to which AI will completely disrupt the white collar working class, but to whatever extent it does, I don't think there's much argument about where the benefit will accrue under our current economic system.
- autobodie 1y ago[flagged]
- danans 1y ago> Your imaginary dystopia is certainly possible, but I would warn against having complete conviction it is the only possible outcome. Absent some form of meaningful redistribution of the economic and power gains that come from AI, the techno-feudalist dystopia becomes a more likely outcome (though not a certain outcome), based on a straightforward extrapolation of the last 40 years of increasing income and wealth inequality. That trend could be arrested (as it was just after WW2), but that probably won't happen by default.