Kudos aren't in order. Another user pointed out that the reviews on the website are fake and that the website claims that the app has 5,000 paying users, even t

Kudos aren't in order. Another user pointed out that the reviews on the website are fake and that the website claims that the app has 5,000 paying users, even though the author here says he has only six. So the website is inaccurate at best, deliberately misleading at worst. OP's comments in the thread, in turn, are plagiarized, presenting obvious LLM output as his own work, in a bid, I imagine, to drum up engagement and discussion, pushing the post higher on the front page. The dishonesty and clumsy attempts at manipulation are unmistakable. This is AI slop, through and through, and the author deserves censure, not praise.