3 ms·
Yes, but “good at” here has a very limited, technical meaning, which can be oversimplified as “better than random chance.” If something can be better than rand
by adastra22 1y ago
Yes, but “good at” here has a very limited, technical meaning, which can be oversimplified as “better than random chance.”
If something can be better than random chance in any arbitrary problem domain it was not trained on, that is AGI.
- RugnirViking 1y agoThat raises the plausible question; are there problem domains where humans cannot do better than random chance, given repeated attempts?
- adastra22 1y agoBitcoin mining.