7 ms·
Oh yes, I did actually realise that. Thank you though. I worded it badly. I should have been clearer in that I was following on from solutionyogi's argument ab
by upthedale 14y ago
Oh yes, I did actually realise that. Thank you though.
I worded it badly. I should have been clearer in that I was following on from solutionyogi's argument about readability.
The compiler example is a bit on the ugly side, wouldn't you say? To then access 'keywords', it becomes
...
.Where(anon => anon.keywords[0] == "verybadexample")
.Select(anon => anon.post);
What I should have said was that I'm not sure how you would scope things in the same way as the 'let' clause when using extension methods with the same level of readability.
- andy_t 14y agoLike this: var thing = from x in stuff let derp = x.herp select { x.name } Equals this: var thing = stuff.Select( x => { var derp = x.herp; return new { x.name }; } ); edit: formatting. I think each have their place, but this absolutely enrages me: var things = ( from x in thingList select x ).ToList()