3 ms·
>I’ve always been a good deal better (maybe a couple hundred ELO points) at blitz (3+0 or 5+0) than bullet (1+0). I believe this is just due to how the ELO sys
by b2fel 1y ago
>I’ve always been a good deal better (maybe a couple hundred ELO points) at blitz (3+0 or 5+0) than bullet (1+0).
I believe this is just due to how the ELO system works on sites like lichess and chess.com - you can also see the difference between blitz and rapid, and rapid and classic,
and it's the case for EVERY player.
- tibbar 1y agoI'm not sure if this is true anymore. Some years ago chess.com increased bullet ratings by 150 points to better align them with blitz ratings [0]. [0]https://www.chess.com/news/view/10-minute-chess-now-rapid-rated-bullet-ratings-increased https://www.chess.com/news/view/10-minute-chess-now-rapid-ra...
- chatmasta 1y ago> it's the case for EVERY player No it isn’t. My bullet rating is higher than my blitz rating and I’ve got 5,000+ games on each.