> I'm genuinely curious about HN's thoughts on AI-assisted learning and whether this approach scales. IMHO this was always the use case that AI mattered for: e

> I'm genuinely curious about HN's thoughts on AI-assisted learning and whether this approach scales. IMHO this was always the use case that AI mattered for: education. To give people less skilled a leg up when learning something fits the desired use-cases for generative AI. Its low stakes (given we're in education) and has a human check before hitting production (in that the dev runs the output to see if it works). The best thing about generative AI is it generates that curiosity to those who never studied CS, as it gives them something that kinda works and lets them tinker with it to change output. Its extremely healthy. To be honest though I figure if you were born 20 years earlier you'd have read a book and managed to make the transition the same, albeit the output product might have been slightly less impressive. The tragedy of such an incredible time to be alive, is that it will likely further re-enforce the fact that most humans can't be bothered. When given this technology, having to expend the effort you have, is likely still too much effort for most. We saw this with the early internet where almost all of human knowledge was available for free online and most people wouldn't be interested in expending the effort to learn it. btw, it looks like your localization is a bit off in the pricing section: "30 créditos incluidos" when in EN.