This is the thing of it: "for most applications." LLMs are not thinking. They way they fail, which is confidently and articulately, is one way they reveal ther

This is the thing of it: "for most applications." LLMs are not thinking. They way they fail, which is confidently and articulately, is one way they reveal there is no mind behind the bland but well-structured text. But if I was tasked with finding 500 patents with weak claims or claims that have been litigated and knocked down, I would turn into LLMs to help automate that. One or two "nines" of reliability is fine, and LLMs would turn this previously impossible task into something plausible to take on.