11 ms·
Think the same thing, we need more breakthroughs. Until then, it is still risky to rely on AI for most applications. The sad thing is that most would take this
by spookie 1y ago
Think the same thing, we need more breakthroughs. Until then, it is still risky to rely on AI for most applications.
The sad thing is that most would take this comment the wrong way. Assuming it is just another doomer take. No, there is still a lot to do, and promissing the world too soon will only lead to disappointment.
- Zigurd 1y agoThis is the thing of it: "for most applications." LLMs are not thinking. They way they fail, which is confidently and articulately, is one way they reveal there is no mind behind the bland but well-structured text. But if I was tasked with finding 500 patents with weak claims or claims that have been litigated and knocked down, I would turn into LLMs to help automate that. One or two "nines" of reliability is fine, and LLMs would turn this previously impossible task into something plausible to take on.