4 ms·
I think that isn't the reason. The article says: > But the threat of soft-target suicide terrorism never came to much, because a suicide bomber is a targeting
by intended 1y ago
I think that isn't the reason. The article says:
> But the threat of soft-target suicide terrorism never came to much, because a suicide bomber is a targeting system with an ego.
stating that many targets which would have truly been disastrous if hit, were ignored because the attackers wanted to satiate their egos or narrative, by hitting landmarks / high profile symbolic sites.
- cakealert 1y agoA drone operator that is caught soon after an attack doesn't differ much from a suicide bomber that removes himself from the world during his attack.
- jonplackett 1y agoReally? There's a pretty massive difference in that one definitely dies, and can only do one mission. The other could control 100s of drones and also believe they won't die.