4 ms·

I think a great use case for AI is to act as triage for a new case so that it can send you to the right specialist and have them evaluate you. It could potentia

I think a great use case for AI is to act as triage for a new case so that it can send you to the right specialist and have them evaluate you. It could potentially remove the need to see a GP for a referral to a specialist, thus freeing the GP up to spend more time treating others.

cess11 1y ago
How are you going to make it reliably stop people that lie to get into contact with medical professions?
- rincebrain 1y ago
  Why does it matter if they do? I've seen a lot of doctors who insist patients must be making up things when they say "but XYZ", and my question becomes...so what? If someone credibly lies to you and gets codeine or ritalin or something once or twice...that's not really significant, in terms of negative outcomes. If someone lies to reach a medical professional, then you treat them like any other bad customer interaction and stop doing business with them after some point.
  - cess11 1y ago
    You're going to have to choose, denying people in need directly, or doing it indirectly because other people game the process and get in the way of those in need.
    - rincebrain 1y ago
      The length of the queue doesn't determine the length of the priority queue for urgent issues necessarily, and more accessible preventative care could hypothetically go a long way toward reducing the demand on first-contact touchpoints in the US's healthcare.
renewiltord 1y ago
You don't need a GP for referral to a specialist currently. You just have to pay. It's what I do. But I understand what you're saying. Insurance gates these but could do so with their own tech rather than relying on the third party. Could help with keeping loss ratios at the minimum.
- edmundsauto 1y ago
  In my experience (arthritis), specialists typically won't take direct appointments without a referral. They don't want to triage the 90%, and most offices are booked weeks-to-months in advance...
  - alistairSH 1y ago
    IME, it’s highly dependent on region and specialty. I can get into local dermatologists without problem. But an endocrinologist takes a referral (because there are so few, and they’re all fully booked).
- BobbyTables2 1y ago
  Specialists differ from GPs in that if you ask them the time, they will have their eyes open when they read the broken clock on the wall. I have no idea what good GPs serve besides flu testing. Sounds unfair but they generally seem uninformed about pretty common medical conditions.
- antasvara 1y ago
  >Insurance gates these but could do so with their own tech rather than relying on the third party. Could help with keeping loss ratios at the minimum. I work in insurance. In my experience, the fact that you have to go to the doctor for a referral discourages people from getting said referral. So the tradeoff is that you would get fewer referral-specific visits (i.e. person going to their GP to get a specialist referral) at the likely expense of more specialist visits.
  - pyuser583 1y ago

cess11 1y ago

How are you going to make it reliably stop people that lie to get into contact with medical professions?

rincebrain 1y ago
Why does it matter if they do? I've seen a lot of doctors who insist patients must be making up things when they say "but XYZ", and my question becomes...so what? If someone credibly lies to you and gets codeine or ritalin or something once or twice...that's not really significant, in terms of negative outcomes. If someone lies to reach a medical professional, then you treat them like any other bad customer interaction and stop doing business with them after some point.
- cess11 1y ago
  You're going to have to choose, denying people in need directly, or doing it indirectly because other people game the process and get in the way of those in need.
  - rincebrain 1y ago
    The length of the queue doesn't determine the length of the priority queue for urgent issues necessarily, and more accessible preventative care could hypothetically go a long way toward reducing the demand on first-contact touchpoints in the US's healthcare.

renewiltord 1y ago

You don't need a GP for referral to a specialist currently. You just have to pay. It's what I do. But I understand what you're saying. Insurance gates these but could do so with their own tech rather than relying on the third party. Could help with keeping loss ratios at the minimum.

edmundsauto 1y ago
In my experience (arthritis), specialists typically won't take direct appointments without a referral. They don't want to triage the 90%, and most offices are booked weeks-to-months in advance...
- alistairSH 1y ago
  IME, it’s highly dependent on region and specialty. I can get into local dermatologists without problem. But an endocrinologist takes a referral (because there are so few, and they’re all fully booked).
BobbyTables2 1y ago
Specialists differ from GPs in that if you ask them the time, they will have their eyes open when they read the broken clock on the wall. I have no idea what good GPs serve besides flu testing. Sounds unfair but they generally seem uninformed about pretty common medical conditions.
antasvara 1y ago
>Insurance gates these but could do so with their own tech rather than relying on the third party. Could help with keeping loss ratios at the minimum. I work in insurance. In my experience, the fact that you have to go to the doctor for a referral discourages people from getting said referral. So the tradeoff is that you would get fewer referral-specific visits (i.e. person going to their GP to get a specialist referral) at the likely expense of more specialist visits.
- pyuser583 1y ago