3 ms·
It's actually not. The "sufficient complexity" part is doing all the heavy lifting. If a proposed physical system is not conscious, well clearly it's not suffic
by stevenhuang 1y ago
It's actually not. The "sufficient complexity" part is doing all the heavy lifting. If a proposed physical system is not conscious, well clearly it's not sufficiently complex.
Am I saying LLMs are sufficiently complex? No.
But can they be in principle? I mean, maybe? We'll have to see right?
Saying something is possible is definitely an easier epistemic position to hold than saying something is impossible, I'll tell you that.