I have some respect for arguments so I'll avoid the snark this time. However, I don't see how any of this is particularly relevant. It seems to be very pro-gove

I have some respect for arguments so I'll avoid the snark this time. However, I don't see how any of this is particularly relevant. It seems to be very pro-government but if you scroll up a bit you'll see my original post was arguing that in this instance the Californian government could fund this; if they care. So I'm not sure what you are disagreeing with. > Are you saying that federal food subsidies should be eliminated under the same principle as eliminating research? That sounds like a good idea to me. Probably, yes.