4 ms·
Thank you for the correction. Is there a term to describe code which although freely viewable is not open-source?
by grabeh 14y ago
Thank you for the correction. Is there a term to describe code which although freely viewable is not open-source?
- ewillbefull 14y agoProprietary.
- grabeh 14y agoBut that for me doesn't capture the aspect of it being freely available to examine/read - perhaps such a term doesn't exist!
- davidw 14y agoI don't think there's one term. "An application with exposed/visible source code", maybe.
- bigiain 14y agoThe term "shared source" exists, and sort-of covers this scenario: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Reciprocal_License#Microsoft_Reciprocal_License_.28Ms-RL.29 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Reciprocal_License#Mi...
- simonster 14y agoMinified JavaScript is only marginally easier to read than disassembled/decompiled binaries.
- Locke1689 14y ago"Source-available"