4 ms·
But the weapons have already been built, so at this point its either you act first or just hope. And hope isn't much of a strategy. Obviously there is a huge
by mupuff1234 1y ago
But the weapons have already been built, so at this point its either you act first or just hope.
And hope isn't much of a strategy.
Obviously there is a huge risk here that if Israel fails then Iran will without a doubt push for a bomb.
- runarberg 1y agoYou seem pretty sure about your beliefs about this, and I doubt there is anything I can say which will convince you otherwise. But when you put forth a testable hypotheses, and experts in the field seem to disagree with your conviction about the matter, perhaps it is time time maybe consider that maybe you are wrong and the experts are right. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/6/13/iran-to-double-down-on-nuclear-programme-after-israeli-strikes-analysts https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/6/13/iran-to-double-down...
- mupuff1234 1y agoBecause it seems fairly obvious to me that if the current nuclear program is taken out the chances that they'll be able to redevelop it in the near to medium term future are extremely low. How exactly will they be able to do so? They won't be able to protect the sites from further attacks, not to mention losing a significant chunk of the expertise in form of personal along with the materials required. It's not some Lego set, rebuilding such a project is insanely complex and time consuming, chances of success are very low (assuming Russia, North Korea, etc, don't decide to just hand some over) Plus, even if they did develop a new program by the time it's done anti missile tech will most likely reach a new phase.