4 ms·
> We knew the computing world was shifting toward mobile, and our traditional PC business faced real threats from tablets and smartphones. We needed to be there
by foobarian 1y ago
> We knew the computing world was shifting toward mobile, and our traditional PC business faced real threats from tablets and smartphones. We needed to be there.
This right here is already game over. Unless they were the ones making the tablets and smartphones and being the threats to everyone else, they had lost at this point one way or another.
- jakelazaroff 1y agoThat is what HP acquired in Palm and webOS: smartphone and tablet products arguably on par with iOS and Android.
- foobarian 1y agoThat attitude is exactly the problem. Thinking "oh we'll just buy company X and check the [x] mobile/tablet box and we'll be in the game". The existing leadership probably smarted from that price tag and expected immediate results without years of investments like Google at least did. The CEO change also didn't help apparently.
- danielmarkbruce 1y agoI'd say this attitude is more common than many realize. Some seem to think "being in the game" is the thing. It's not just acquisitions - it's half assed investment in product lines. You have to win.
- jakelazaroff 1y agoI mean, they were in the game. The problem is that they immediately folded.
- stahtops 1y agoIt isn’t game over, but the path to success clearly wasn’t to buy another company and release a product (that was probably already in the queue) only a year later.
- rjsw 1y agoHP already had plenty of experience of building handheld computers at that point. Their own and from Compaq and Digital.
- pipeline_peak 1y agoThat's something but the Post iPhone 1 generation of Smartphones was a major leap passed PDA's. They needed an App store to entice developers and bring about killer apps. There was no logical reason to buy an HP Palm, it was too expensive even.