2 ms·
> I am once again asking for evidence of this claim. It’s a theory based on the effects frontiers have tended to have on society in the past. For frontiers bey
by cosmic_cheese 1y ago
> I am once again asking for evidence of this claim.
It’s a theory based on the effects frontiers have tended to have on society in the past. For frontiers beyond Earth’s orbit specifically, presenting evidence is impossible because it’s not something we’ve done. Either way, I think it’s a good thing to have somewhere for people who feel tired and defeated as well as those looking to build something for themselves to go.
> The only reason you see it this way instead of right-sizing space investment and preventing other fields from atrophying is because, surprise, you've already concluded space travel is super important -- and for reasons that you cannot articulate.
I’m not opposed to “right sizing” crewed space investments as long as it doesn’t mean sidelining it to the point of being stuck in a 90s-esque state of dinking around in low Earth orbit forever. I’m not saying to throw everything we have at it and make it all happen ASAP. I’m aware it’s something that will take a long time, and that’s exacerbated by cost. Start small and grow over time. That’s fine. Just keep it moving forward at a steady pace, that’s all I really want.
- sorcerer-mar 1y agoI don't need evidence from the frontier beyond earth, I need evidence that "having frontier" has any meaningful effect whatsoever on social stability. You presumably don't have any because, like the other arguments, it's a sci-fi vignette and not reality. Agreed that progress on space exploration shouldn't stop. I really have never heard a good argument for manned space exploration, which is dramatically more expensive, complicated, and risky, though.