3 ms·
It's absolutely NOT silly. If a service is provided without guardrails and it can affect people suffering of mental health issues, it is clearly problematic
by oulipo 1y ago
It's absolutely NOT silly. If a service is provided without guardrails and it can affect people suffering of mental health issues, it is clearly problematic
- infecto 1y agoYou could apply that to simply interacting with the world then. We should be giving annual or semi-annual mental health tests to everyone and institutionalizing folks that need it then. I am mostly playing devils advocate here, why focus only on chat bots, this should apply to nearly all aspects of life. This article has for all I know cherry picked examples. I consider myself of sound mind and would assume all of these folks already had mental breaks prior to using ChatGPT, who is to say the outcome is statistically different in these folks that broke compared to folks that did not use ChatGPT and also had a mental crisis. It’s a silly feel good story instead aimed catered for folks that have a negative bias towards OpenAI.
- sorcerer-mar 1y agoWe put fences on bridges, we have (light) guardrails around purchasing firearms, we have questionnaires when prescribing certain drugs, we do all sorts of things to protect the vulnerable among us. It's silly not to be able to see all these "silly" things we do all over our society.
- oulipo 1y agoWell... that's what people do? When people have issues we provide guardrails as a society