4 ms·
Doesn't look like it, picking a random domain from this list gives the same result as from 1.1.1.1: dig bs.to @1.1.1.1 ;; ANSWER SECTION: bs.to. 164 IN
by lode 1y ago
Doesn't look like it, picking a random domain from this list gives the same result as from 1.1.1.1:
dig bs.to @1.1.1.1
;; ANSWER SECTION:
bs.to. 164 IN A 190.115.31.20
dig bs.to @193.110.81.0
;; ANSWER SECTION:
bs.to. 300 IN A 190.115.31.20
- aleph_minus_one 1y agoTest in particular the very newest, and the still used domains from the Wikipedia list such as * nox.to * getrockmusic.net * libgen.gs * sci-hub.st
- tom1337 1y agoAlso resolves correctly - they do not seem to be doing censoring right now.
- aleph_minus_one 1y agoThanks for doing the tests. Another interesting test case are the following domains (Russian propaganda websites) that many German (European?) internet providers are prone to block: rt.com de.rt.com www.rt.com ria.ru radiosputnik.ria.ru radiosputnik.com For example in Germany, Vodafone blocks the first three ones. The reason for this blocking is not the CUII list, but ANNEX XV of "COUNCIL REGULATION (EU) 2022/350 of 1 March 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia's actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine": https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX%3A32022R0350 https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CEL...