5 ms·

Isn't being in closed beta a good solution to this paradox?

• pytrin 14y ago
  Good point - I consider a closed beta a product that hasn't launched yet. It is meant to test features and experience, but not to measure actual real-world traction. In this case I would suggest to raise before opening it to the public, since there is no going back once you do.
• wiradikusuma 14y ago
  but no matter in what 'state' your product is in (beta/alpha/omega), wouldn't the investor still ask, "how many users (and traction) you have at the moment?" it's not like you can say, "whoops, we don't install analytics in beta, but we received good feedbacks from people in HN, so give us the money."
• K2h 14y ago
  I was thinking the same thing. Could even an open beta be considered a 'not launched yet' and give you an out should potential investors want to know why the growth hasn't been demonstrated yet? What would the downside to an open beta be vs a closed beta?
  • adambenayoun 14y ago
    You need to be careful with the 'closed beta' stage, It's really easy to get "sucked" into that state for a longer period than you thought and blame all of your shortcomings on being in closed beta. Don't forget to ship. Regarding the 'open beta' - I don't think it's applicable, if you're open to users and anyone can register and growth hasn't happened yet, investors will spot that.
    • K2h 14y ago
      Thanks!