6 ms·
It would be interesting to benchmark this against consumer USB DACs that are marketed for sound. You can get 32-bit 192kHz bandwidth (384kHz sampling rate) DAC
by aidenn0 1y ago
It would be interesting to benchmark this against consumer USB DACs that are marketed for sound. You can get 32-bit 192kHz bandwidth (384kHz sampling rate) DACs now for under $200. Obviously this is much lower bandwidth than the R&S, but I'd be interested to see the dynamic range of a modern DAC when approaching Nyquist; I don't have a strong belief one way or the other over which would win, given that 14-bits of dynamic range is about where the integrity of your analog path starts to matter a whole lot.
[edit]
Sound Blaster claims "up to" 130dB of dynamic range on theirs. Putting aside how much work the "up to" id doing, this would make the last 9 or 10 bits completely useless, even for undithered signals, but I was thinking of something cheaper, by one of those fly-by-night companies with names made of random letters.