The article is complete nonsense because AI generated code is often buggy, and always needs to be reviewed in detail. Also, the code can only be good if the pro

The article is complete nonsense because AI generated code is often buggy, and always needs to be reviewed in detail. Also, the code can only be good if the prompt is good and detailed. All of this takes up a significant amount of time. It would seem that the author is technically incapable of reviewing code, which is why it's not even an afterthought.