> My point was congruent with the argument that LLMs are not humans or possess human-like thinking and reasoning, and you have conveniently demonstrated that.

> My point was congruent with the argument that LLMs are not humans or possess human-like thinking and reasoning, and you have conveniently demonstrated that. I mean, they are obviously not humans, that is trivially true, yes. I don't know what I said makes you believe I demonstrated that they do not possess human-like thinking and reasoning, though, considering I've mostly pointed out ways they seem similar to humans. Can you articulate your point there?