> No other good books on algorithms, but lots on patterns. CLRS is on the list; 28. And I, likewise, was unhappy with his exclusion of technology-specific tex

> No other good books on algorithms, but lots on patterns. CLRS is on the list; 28. And I, likewise, was unhappy with his exclusion of technology-specific texts. It seems as though he is asserting that generalizable ideas can only come from books that purport to be general.