2 ms·
> that is useful for discretion the argument it targets. dissecting? discussing? It serves to make a reader ponder whether an individual (judge or POTUS) sets
by defrost 1y ago
> that is useful for discretion the argument it targets.
dissecting? discussing?
It serves to make a reader ponder whether an individual (judge or POTUS) sets the mood of an entire country (does Brazil or the US 'want' what a judge or POTUS wants?) and reminds us that the current US administration admires strongarm tactics.
- matheusmoreira 1y agoYour comments are appreciated. I wasn't aware of the information you posted.