> But the worse problem is, who decides what's "damaging"? The politicians do. It is the courts that decide damages. My argument in the post is that it is rea

> But the worse problem is, who decides what's "damaging"? The politicians do. It is the courts that decide damages. My argument in the post is that it is really only the widely distributed "viral" posts that cause enough damage to for liability to be an issue. Since the social media companies have a lot of say in what goes viral and closely monitor popularity for advertising reasons, they are in a position to fix the problem and a liable if they do not. They don't even have to remove posts - just stop pushing them.