4 ms·
Or, just learn / use awk, since you'll need it anyway.
by dsjkvf 1y ago
Or, just learn / use awk, since you'll need it anyway.
- video_2 1y agoawk is nice in a lot of cases, especially for tabular data, but it's hard to deny vim's capabilities for handling plain text using text objects. For instance, you can't really tell awk to just "extract this entire sentence" like you can with vim.
- dsjkvf 1y agoYou realize Vim will detect "sentence" based on exactly the same regex you can feed to awk? And "tabular data", dear me...
- video_2 1y agoYes, but vicut is also faster on benchmarks. And you won't need to write out a whole regex. Also, I'd love to see what this "sentence finding" regex of yours would look like. I'm sure it's way better than just typing "vis"
- dsjkvf 1y ago> Yes, but vicut is also faster on benchmarks Than awk? I very, very doubt your 0.001-3s findings. > I'm sure it's way better than just typing "vis" Of course. Because you can use it everywhere, that's the whole point of learning regex, awk, or any other POSIX tool.