4 ms·
Honestly, the list looks legit. Computers nowadays are semi-remotely-managed appliances. Internet is presumed, offline is not first, and offline is absolutely n
by npteljes 1y ago
Honestly, the list looks legit. Computers nowadays are semi-remotely-managed appliances. Internet is presumed, offline is not first, and offline is absolutely not exclusive.
>I have been trying to minimize to the extent possible the reach of big tech into my life.
I don't think this goal is possible, or worthwhile, on a big tech offering like a Mac + macOS. It can certainly be tried, but the user needs to be prepared for unforeseen consequences, and the override of the settings. It is like plugging in the ears to have a quieter life, in the middle of a metropolis. In the end, the context won't change. The direction of the platforms are clear, and the zeitgeist is bigger than all of us. The first option with a real impact is leaving the ecosystem.
Although, blocking some domains could be a good first step towards that. Rome wasn't built in a day.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- TheNewsIsHere 1y agoAs a counterpoint - There are a lot of Apple services that get contacted because they can be contacted, not because they need to be. For example, I don’t use Home/HomeKit but it phones home to Apple several times a day if I allow it. The same with Apple News, Weather, etc. You can prevent this in various ways but not out of box. It’s possible to run macOS without an Internet connection. I value this, but it’s impractical and unnecessary for most people and most environments.
- npteljes 1y agoWhat's the value for you of disabling these connections, like the Home/HomeKit contact?