2 ms·
"California safety regulations currently require operators to be "stationed" at the controls." This is NOT a huge burden. Any robotics company operating a flee
by chfritz 1y ago
"California safety regulations currently require operators to be "stationed" at the controls."
This is NOT a huge burden. Any robotics company operating a fleet today will have someone watching almost all the time in one form or another anyways. So this really just becomes a matter of interpreting what "the controls" means. The regulation seem to omit any mention of "on the device/vehicle" so these controls can clearly be remote. It also doesn't seem to specify a 1:1 ratio of operators to devices. So if there is one operator, e.g., at the air-conditioned HQ of the robotics vendor, at the "controls" of twenty tractors that are operating in the field which the operator can see remotely using low-latency video-streaming and which he can stop instantly with the press of a button, then that might already be all that is required. It certainly is logically.
- robocat 1y ago> so these controls can clearly be remote If data connectivity is available. Maybe a reasonable assumption now with starlink, but previously not so easy in a lot of rural area.
- PeterStuer 1y agoMany of these (used to?) have a local positioning setup for getting high resolution local precision. Maybe advances in vision have lessened the need. For control network you'd rely on local comms. Not generic telco grid.