4 ms·

> [6][obsolete source] I didn't know but apparently wikipedia treats old sources as obsolete, doesn't matter if there's new information or not that would make

> [6][obsolete source] I didn't know but apparently wikipedia treats old sources as obsolete, doesn't matter if there's new information or not that would make it obsolete. I wonder if any sources supporting the notion that the earth is round must be updated every couple of years with a new source or study.

deleted 1y ago
[deleted]
cwmoore 1y ago
That exemplifies a much deeper problem than good information, “Good Law”: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Good_law https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Good_law As an aside, the earth is almost flat, just not nearly as flat as the Universe.
- DrammBA 1y ago
  > As an aside, the earth is almost flat, just not nearly as flat as the Universe. Source? And make sure to update your response every few years.
  - cwmoore 1y ago
    It’s in the Library of Babylon. My standing citation.
mkl 1y ago
Obsolete doesn't just mean old, it means superseded by newer information.
- DrammBA 1y ago
  I agree with you, wikipedia seems to disagree with both of us