2 ms·
They could be better, but I don't agree they're nonsensical. The comment is fine as a comment, but when asked to give a literary critique pointing out that the
by vidarh 1y ago
They could be better, but I don't agree they're nonsensical. The comment is fine as a comment, but when asked to give a literary critique pointing out that the language could be clearer is entirely reasonable.
But this is also besides the point, which is that it is trivial to get these models to argue - rightly or wrongly - that there are significant issues with your writing rather than claim everything is excellent.
Whether you can get critiques you agree are reasonable is another matter.
- suddenlybananas 1y agoOkay but if it's just saying bullshit, it's useless as a critic.
- vidarh 1y agoIf it was just saying bullshit, I'd agree, but it isn't.
- suddenlybananas 1y agoIt was though. It hallucinated words that weren't in the text and criticised entirely fine things.
- vidarh 1y agoEntirely fine to you. To me the criticism made sense given the instructions it was given. To make a minor error just makes it no better than a human. It did not hallucinate words that weren't in the text - there was a "this", just in the following sentence -, and when you make an error like that, it's quite ironic in this context that you're demanding better precision from a model you have such low opinion of than what you've demonstrated yourself.