3 ms·
I feel it's unlikely that this the explanation for what GGP had in mind. I postulate that names characters usually have no variants, thus do not undergo unifica
by bmn__ 1y ago
I feel it's unlikely that this the explanation for what GGP had in mind. I postulate that names characters usually have no variants, thus do not undergo unification, or where there are variants, they are already encoded as Z variants, so the contention is also moot.
Prove me wrong with a counter-example.
- SAI_Peregrinus 1y agohttps://soranews24.com/2014/02/13/japanese-woman-celebrates-100th-birthday-boggles-netizens-with-her-name/ https://soranews24.com/2014/02/13/japanese-woman-celebrates-... First search result.
- bmn__ 1y ago𫟈 is U+2B7C8 "CJK Unified Ideograph- 2B7C8". 𛁻 is U+1B07B "Hentaigana Letter To-5". Both character fall into the first category I mentioned, no variants.