4 ms·

Tangibly related: Bun has a built-in S3-compatible client. Bun is a gift, if you're using npm consider making the switch.

by yard2010 1y ago

neon_me 1y ago
is there a way to wrap their s3 client for use in HonoJS/CF workers?
- oakesm9 1y ago
  No. It's implemented in native code (Zig) inside bun itself and just exposed to developers as a JavaScript API. Source code: https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/tree/6ebad50543bf2c4107d4b4c2ecc062a15a94b71e/src/s3 https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/tree/6ebad50543bf2c4107d4b4c2...
  - neon_me 1y ago
    10/10 Loving it (and how fast it is!) - its just not the use-case that fits my needs. I want maximum ability to "move" my projects among services/vendors/providers
- throawayonthe 1y ago
  i assume you can just use it[0] in your project and then build (using bun) for cf workers[1] [0] https://bun.sh/docs/api/s3 https://bun.sh/docs/api/s3 [1] https://hono.dev/docs/getting-started/cloudflare-workers https://hono.dev/docs/getting-started/cloudflare-workers \ (https://bun.sh/docs/api/workers https://bun.sh/docs/api/workers ?)
ChocolateGod 1y ago
I tried to go this route of using Bun for everything (Bun.serve, Bun.s3 etc), but was forced back to switch back to NodeJS proper and Express/aws-sdk due to Bun not fully implementing Nodes APIs.
- biorach 1y ago
  What were the most significant missing bits?
  - eknkc 1y ago
    The worst thing is issues without any visibility. The other day I was toying with the MCP server (https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk). I default to bun these days and the http based server simply did not register in claude or any other client. No error logs, nothing. After fiddling with my code I simply tried node and it just worked.
    - zackify 1y ago
      It definitely works in bun just fine. I have a production built mcp server with auth running under bun. Now if you convert the request / response types to native bun server, it can be finicky. But it works fine using express under bun with the official protocol implementation for typescript. Actually writing a book about this too and will be using bun for it https://leanpub.com/creatingmcpserverswithoauth https://leanpub.com/creatingmcpserverswithoauth
  - tengbretson 1y ago
    Not sure about the specific underlying apis, but as of my last attempt, Bun still doesn't support PDF.js (pdfjs-dist), ssh2, or playwright.
  - ChocolateGod 1y ago
    localAddress is unsupported on sockets, meaning you can not specify an outgoing interface, which is useful if you have multiple network cards.
pier25 1y ago
Proividing built APIs to not rely on NPM is one of the most interesting aspects of Bun IMO.
- greener_grass 1y ago
  Can someone explain the advantage of this? If I want S3 access, I can just use NPM If I don't want S3 access, I don't want it integrated into my runtime
  - pier25 1y ago
    Would you rather use an officially maintained solution or some random package by a random author who might abandon the project (or worse)?
    - greener_grass 1y ago
      The S3 packages on NPM are maintained by AWS
      - pier25 1y ago
        Indeed but I was arguing about a general point. I'd be surprised if any of your Node projects had less than 100 total deps of which a large number will be maintained by a single person. See Express for example. 66 total deps with 26 deps relying on a single maintainer. https://npmgraph.js.org/?q=express https://npmgraph.js.org/?q=express But even in the case of the official aws-sdk they recently deprecated v2. I now need to update all my not-so-old Node projects to work with the newer version. Probably wouldn't have happened if I had used Bun's S3 client.
        greener_grass 1y ago
        So let's put every package under the sun into the client? This approach does not scale. We should make NPM better.
zackify 1y ago
I came here to say the same thing. Rather ship oven/bun through docker and have a 90mb container vs using node.
deleted 1y ago
[deleted]

Tangibly related: Bun has a built-in S3-compatible client. Bun is a gift, if you're using npm consider making the switch.

neon_me 1y ago

is there a way to wrap their s3 client for use in HonoJS/CF workers?

oakesm9 1y ago
No. It's implemented in native code (Zig) inside bun itself and just exposed to developers as a JavaScript API. Source code: https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/tree/6ebad50543bf2c4107d4b4c2ecc062a15a94b71e/src/s3 https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/tree/6ebad50543bf2c4107d4b4c2...
- neon_me 1y ago
  10/10 Loving it (and how fast it is!) - its just not the use-case that fits my needs. I want maximum ability to "move" my projects among services/vendors/providers
throawayonthe 1y ago
i assume you can just use it[0] in your project and then build (using bun) for cf workers[1] [0] https://bun.sh/docs/api/s3 https://bun.sh/docs/api/s3 [1] https://hono.dev/docs/getting-started/cloudflare-workers https://hono.dev/docs/getting-started/cloudflare-workers \ (https://bun.sh/docs/api/workers https://bun.sh/docs/api/workers ?)

ChocolateGod 1y ago

I tried to go this route of using Bun for everything (Bun.serve, Bun.s3 etc), but was forced back to switch back to NodeJS proper and Express/aws-sdk due to Bun not fully implementing Nodes APIs.

biorach 1y ago
What were the most significant missing bits?
- eknkc 1y ago
  The worst thing is issues without any visibility. The other day I was toying with the MCP server (https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk). I default to bun these days and the http based server simply did not register in claude or any other client. No error logs, nothing. After fiddling with my code I simply tried node and it just worked.
  - zackify 1y ago
    It definitely works in bun just fine. I have a production built mcp server with auth running under bun. Now if you convert the request / response types to native bun server, it can be finicky. But it works fine using express under bun with the official protocol implementation for typescript. Actually writing a book about this too and will be using bun for it https://leanpub.com/creatingmcpserverswithoauth https://leanpub.com/creatingmcpserverswithoauth
- tengbretson 1y ago
  Not sure about the specific underlying apis, but as of my last attempt, Bun still doesn't support PDF.js (pdfjs-dist), ssh2, or playwright.
- ChocolateGod 1y ago
  localAddress is unsupported on sockets, meaning you can not specify an outgoing interface, which is useful if you have multiple network cards.

pier25 1y ago

Proividing built APIs to not rely on NPM is one of the most interesting aspects of Bun IMO.

greener_grass 1y ago
Can someone explain the advantage of this? If I want S3 access, I can just use NPM If I don't want S3 access, I don't want it integrated into my runtime
- pier25 1y ago
  Would you rather use an officially maintained solution or some random package by a random author who might abandon the project (or worse)?
  - greener_grass 1y ago
    The S3 packages on NPM are maintained by AWS
    - pier25 1y ago
      Indeed but I was arguing about a general point. I'd be surprised if any of your Node projects had less than 100 total deps of which a large number will be maintained by a single person. See Express for example. 66 total deps with 26 deps relying on a single maintainer. https://npmgraph.js.org/?q=express https://npmgraph.js.org/?q=express But even in the case of the official aws-sdk they recently deprecated v2. I now need to update all my not-so-old Node projects to work with the newer version. Probably wouldn't have happened if I had used Bun's S3 client.
      - greener_grass 1y ago
        So let's put every package under the sun into the client? This approach does not scale. We should make NPM better.

zackify 1y ago

I came here to say the same thing. Rather ship oven/bun through docker and have a 90mb container vs using node.

deleted 1y ago

[deleted]