> Ladybird is building a browser with a couple million dollars, why can't Mozilla do the same? 1. Ladybird isn't currently competing with Mozilla or anyone, so

> Ladybird is building a browser with a couple million dollars, why can't Mozilla do the same? 1. Ladybird isn't currently competing with Mozilla or anyone, so this is hypothetical. 2. It's a different problem space, because Mozilla is maintaining a decades old browser. 3. Mozilla is developing a very good browser considering how much money they have. They're competitive with Chrome on features and performance, while Google is dedicating much more money towards Chrome.