> for near negligible drop in quality Hmm, that's evidently and anecdotally wrong: https://github.com/ggml-org/llama.cpp/discussions/4110 https://github.com/

> for near negligible drop in quality Hmm, that's evidently and anecdotally wrong: https://github.com/ggml-org/llama.cpp/discussions/4110 https://github.com/ggml-org/llama.cpp/discussions/4110