3 ms·
I think they were talking about total time spent working rather than remote vs. in-person. I've seen more than a few studies over the years showing that going f
by throwaway0123_5 1y ago
I think they were talking about total time spent working rather than remote vs. in-person. I've seen more than a few studies over the years showing that going from 40 to 35 or 30 hours/wk has minimal or positive impacts on productivity. Idk if that would apply to all work environments though, and I don't recall any of the studies being about research productivity specifically.
- hdjrudni 1y ago> I think they were talking about total time spent working rather than remote vs. in-person. I was, yes. I should have omitted the "in office" part but I was referencing the "work more hours in America than France"