> It implies that they are deep fundamental laws of the universe Rather they are deep fundamentals of what your brain can contain, so you perceive them as fund

> It implies that they are deep fundamental laws of the universe Rather they are deep fundamentals of what your brain can contain, so you perceive them as fundamental to the universe. If we admit there are all sorts of phenomena which we cannot observe directly, which we ultimately observe through machines we construct -- does your imagination permit that there are possibly thoughts that are literally unthinkable to you? What would an artifact that allows us to contain some shadow or essence of these thoughts look like?