3 ms·

Immune from criminal prosecution, but if Dems actually had someone with balls in charge, they can go after a lot of his stuff like seizing funds, sanctioning bu

Immune from criminal prosecution, but if Dems actually had someone with balls in charge, they can go after a lot of his stuff like seizing funds, sanctioning businesses, and so on (cause in all likelyhood, they are funded by his crypto scams and insider trading)

johnnyanmac 1y ago
Also note only the president is immune. Bondi can still be charged. Hegseth can still be held liable. Elon Musk wasn't even elected nor approved by anyone in office. I do hope we have our version of a Numenburg trials one day, but I also wouldn't be surprised if all these people squirm under the cracks once their near octogenarian rallying point declines.
- monetus 1y ago
  One question that they presume the answer to iiuc, is that they have a pardon waiting for them. - an inverted sword of Damocles hanging out waiting to save them. IMO, many probably do, but plenty who think they will be safe don't have the right profile and will only be offered one if they have enough money. Guliani offered them for.. 2 million I think last time? You'll have to check that.
- cosmicgadget 1y ago
  Trump is pardoning people for buying Mar a Lago dinners. He certainly is going to pardon people he considers loyal.
- andrekandre 1y ago
  > Bondi can still be charged. Hegseth can still be held liable. it will become harder of the house budget bill passes in the senate [0] [0] https://www.snopes.com/news/2025/05/27/trumps-budget-contempt/ https://www.snopes.com/news/2025/05/27/trumps-budget-contemp...
deepsun 1y ago
And repealing the immunity. I think that's a pretty obvious path. It's not like "immunity" is set in stone forever.
- cosmicgadget 1y ago
  You can't repeal immunity. The only paths here are a constitutional amendment or SCOTUS that overturns their previous decision. Both are nigh impossible before Trump croaks.
cosmicgadget 1y ago
I read your above comment to be "Trump won't relinquish power because it will make him vulnerable to prosecution". If that was not your point then I misunderstood it. If it was, he is not vulnerable to prosecution nor is he liable civily for official acts. You are right a lot of his actions can be (and have been) stopped via legal means. That's not so much democrats as individuals and groups with standing to bring suit. The dems can't really do much except fund the lawsuits which, again, don't threaten Trump in any way.

johnnyanmac 1y ago

Also note only the president is immune. Bondi can still be charged. Hegseth can still be held liable. Elon Musk wasn't even elected nor approved by anyone in office. I do hope we have our version of a Numenburg trials one day, but I also wouldn't be surprised if all these people squirm under the cracks once their near octogenarian rallying point declines.

monetus 1y ago
One question that they presume the answer to iiuc, is that they have a pardon waiting for them. - an inverted sword of Damocles hanging out waiting to save them. IMO, many probably do, but plenty who think they will be safe don't have the right profile and will only be offered one if they have enough money. Guliani offered them for.. 2 million I think last time? You'll have to check that.
cosmicgadget 1y ago
Trump is pardoning people for buying Mar a Lago dinners. He certainly is going to pardon people he considers loyal.
andrekandre 1y ago
> Bondi can still be charged. Hegseth can still be held liable. it will become harder of the house budget bill passes in the senate [0] [0] https://www.snopes.com/news/2025/05/27/trumps-budget-contempt/ https://www.snopes.com/news/2025/05/27/trumps-budget-contemp...

deepsun 1y ago

And repealing the immunity. I think that's a pretty obvious path. It's not like "immunity" is set in stone forever.

cosmicgadget 1y ago
You can't repeal immunity. The only paths here are a constitutional amendment or SCOTUS that overturns their previous decision. Both are nigh impossible before Trump croaks.

cosmicgadget 1y ago

I read your above comment to be "Trump won't relinquish power because it will make him vulnerable to prosecution". If that was not your point then I misunderstood it. If it was, he is not vulnerable to prosecution nor is he liable civily for official acts. You are right a lot of his actions can be (and have been) stopped via legal means. That's not so much democrats as individuals and groups with standing to bring suit. The dems can't really do much except fund the lawsuits which, again, don't threaten Trump in any way.