3 ms·
I'm just confused why Meta needed to do this. Isn't fingerprinting good enough to not risk building this? All I can think is they use something like this to pro
by jmward01 1y ago
I'm just confused why Meta needed to do this. Isn't fingerprinting good enough to not risk building this? All I can think is they use something like this to prove out their other tracking tech is working (this is the test set effectively). It is obvious that they really have several of these types of tracking technologies so that if one gets found out/patched they can switch it off and say 'look we stopped' all while still tracking with impunity. It just seems dumb that they would keep something this blatant in use.
- SoftTalker 1y agoSociopathic people are running the company. You tell them they can't do something, they take it as a challenge and try to do it without getting caught.
- jaks6 1y agoThis provides them an easy way to build a labelled dataset for training the fingerprinting ML models.