4 ms·
This comment doesn’t seem very substantive. Care to elaborate why exactly this is such a bad implementation of containers? Seems like a more secure implementa
by stingraycharles 1y ago
This comment doesn’t seem very substantive.
Care to elaborate why exactly this is such a bad implementation of containers?
Seems like a more secure implementation than Docker Engine, and if - as I pressure - memory management is automatic, then it will be pretty great to use.
- creshal 1y ago> and if - as I pressure [presume?] - memory management is automatic Why would it be? Nothing in the Linux kernel properly supports that on a VM level (ballooning only goes in one direction, and even that only on a good day), and if Apple had managed to solve that particular Gordian knot they would've told people.
- stingraycharles 1y agoIsn’t memory management somewhat automatic on WSL2? Isn’t that the same problem?
- creshal 1y agoI've yet to see it actually work reliably, but YMMV. Either way there doesn't seem to be any indication of a similar feature attempt for Apple's runtime - since containers are meant to be restarted regularly, they might just not bother with wasting time on that feature.