> This is all just a long-winded way of saying: you don’t just stumble across insecure critical infrastructure every day, and when you do, it’s usually just a o

> This is all just a long-winded way of saying: you don’t just stumble across insecure critical infrastructure every day, and when you do, it’s usually just a one-off host with a misconfiguration, and not an issue that affects a large number of hosts. But if you do find yourself in a situation where there seems to be some widespread security issue in actual critical infrastructure, you should be encouraged to reevaluate and reassess because in all probability, it’s not what you think it is. ... or in this case, it is what you think it is. This article could have benefited from some stern and constructive editing. In the age of AI, I find myself with very little patience for verbose and vapid writing.