"The key to understanding this paradox is that the two games are not independent." Well... can it really be called a paradox then? It's more of a classical fai

"The key to understanding this paradox is that the two games are not independent." Well... can it really be called a paradox then? It's more of a classical failure at defining the problem since the probability distribution of B definitely depends on A - the description is just more convoluted, but it's not a contradiction.