5 ms·
That was my reaction as well. They're probably referring to something along these lines: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3665046 https://pap
by morsch 1y ago
That was my reaction as well. They're probably referring to something along these lines: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3665046 https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3665046
- mdeeks 1y agoDoesn't this study say that it had a very low impact? > they led to a permanent reduction of approximately 8,000 births in the same year, and 145,000 fewer births since 1980
- alexey-salmin 1y agoThe paper also estimates the number of children saved at 57 per year, so the safety impact is even lower
- morsch 1y agoLet's call it 80 and you get a rate of 1:100 children saved per children not conceived. What would be a reasonable rate in your mind?
- Yossarrian22 1y agoCar seat design has improved you can readily fit three car seats in most vehicles these days
- baseballdork 1y agoThis is a weirdly funny thread. How many theoretical children would you trade for 1 real child? All over a car seat that perhaps prevented 4,000 additional births a year?