3 ms·
It's just a bad example. Sorry you're upset I called it out. The original settings app had a nondescript "General" label for this same setting: neither tells m
by BoorishBears 1y ago
It's just a bad example. Sorry you're upset I called it out.
The original settings app had a nondescript "General" label for this same setting: neither tells me to expect a default browser setting.
Overall the old UI was just the current UI with lower information density.
- TlrSwftFrPres 1y ago> A setting's placement in the menu hierarchy "is a bad example" of the Settings app's being bad because search is available. > Search is always available while the app is open, across all menus and functions. > Therefore no placement or layout can be singled out as better or worse in the Settings app. All possible hierarchies or arrangements are equal. > I unroll my Apple UX Researcher Toolkit (contents: blindfold, dart, dartboard, crack pipe), and use it to make my decision: I put the dropdown 3 levels deep under Touch ID, safe in the knowledge that I cannot be criticized, because we've also included a search bar. It's just bad thinking. Sorry if you're upset I've called it out.