3 ms·
>> Members of the ACIP are appointed to four-year terms, and many were slated to serve on the committee for another three years. Kennedy wrote Monday that “with
by ethbr1 1y ago
>> Members of the ACIP are appointed to four-year terms, and many were slated to serve on the committee for another three years. Kennedy wrote Monday that “without removing the current members, the current Trump administration would not have been able to appoint a majority of new members until 2028.”
So, another lawsuit against illegal executive branch dismissal of federal workers, then?
- pixelatedindex 1y agoIndeed, but sadly I’m sure the Supreme Court is more than happy to step in on Trump’s behalf and hand waive any issues away.
- GenerocUsername 1y agoIllegal? The committee is under the control of HHS Secretary... JFK. He literally has the authority to do what he did. Changing a plan you inherited but now own is not illegal.
- NewJazz 1y agoI'm not sure how this committee is structured and the rules around appointments, but members of many committees and boards that are part of the executive cannot be removed without cause.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- johnnyanmac 1y agoIANAL but executive retainers do tend to have some protections precisely for thus reason. You don't want a shift in presidency and then for them to hollow out 4+ years of tenure to advance their agenda. There needs to be some non-partisanship so the sceicne isn't bogged down by beuracracy. At the bare minumum, most government workers get due notice of their termination. The federal government is for the most part not at-will.
- GenerocUsername 1y agoHe ousted the whole group which does have more standing than singling someone out. And reasoning can be as simple as conflict of interest... Eg being unwilling to challenge pharma lobbyist current state directives
- _DeadFred_ 1y agoDidn't he testify to Congress during confirmation that he wouldn't do this sort of drastic change? Pretty sure perjury to Congress IS extremely illegal.