3 ms·
Here’s a much better treatment of methylene blue than this article: https://youtu.be/CnIJbbCvFdQ?si=lQ1i2Ah7ZIt6hewT https://youtu.be/CnIJbbCvFdQ?si=lQ1i2Ah7ZI
by HiroshiSan 1y ago
Here’s a much better treatment of methylene blue than this article:
https://youtu.be/CnIJbbCvFdQ?si=lQ1i2Ah7ZIt6hewT https://youtu.be/CnIJbbCvFdQ?si=lQ1i2Ah7ZIt6hewT
- jdiff 1y agoIs it? I don't see any sources linked to any studies at all in the description. I do however see an extensive list of affiliate and sponsor links to everything from sketchy supplements to anti-aging clinics featuring blood analysis to the evergreen classic: penis pumps.
- HiroshiSan 1y agoThe studies referenced are highlighted and spread throughout the video for each point he talks about. I’m not sure what penis pumps have to do with the quality of his research, they’re a legitimate medical device used in patients with erectile dysfunction. [1] [1] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9497591/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9497591/
- jdiff 1y agoSure, they have a legitimate function. So do ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine. But they exist in a very particular and not-at-all reputable advertising niche. One that is noteworthily and heavily represented here. An hour is a significant time investment. Not linking to your sources increases the bar for verifying claims high enough that it's suspicious to not do so. I can't verify your claims about dosage. I can investigate the claims made in this article. If you want to strengthen your argument and ensure you aren't walking yourself down a path based on nothing but other people's ability to weave a narrative, you should seek out stronger sources for topics you care about.